The one case that catches people out
A single fixed pulley — one bolted to the ceiling, with the rope going over it and down to the load — gives you no mechanical advantage at all. One rope segment supports the load, so the effort equals the load. Lifting 50 kg takes 50 kg of pull.
It is still useful, because it changes the direction of your effort: you pull down, using your body weight, instead of hauling up. That is a real ergonomic gain and no force gain, and test writers love the distinction. If you counted "one pulley, so half the weight," you fell for exactly the trap the question was built around.
A movable pulley is the opposite: it hangs in the rope and rides up with the load, so two segments support it and the effort halves. Two movable pulleys, four segments, a quarter. The pattern is segments, always segments.
How to answer one in under thirty seconds
1. Find the load, and look only at the strands that pull upward on the moving block. Ignore the strand you hold if it runs down from a fixed pulley — that one changes direction, it does not support the load.
2. Count those strands. Call it n.
3. Effort = load ÷ n. Distance pulled = height lifted × n.
4. Sanity-check the direction: more pulleys should mean less force and more rope. If your answer needs more force than the bare load, you have inverted something.
One more habit worth building: before you compute, guess whether the answer should be bigger or smaller than the load. Most wrong options on these tests are the load itself, double it, or the result of dividing by the pulley count instead of the segment count — all of which you can eliminate by direction alone.