🔍 Think Clearly: Logic & Critical Thinking
Think Clearly: Logic & Critical Thinking
参考斯坦福 CS146S 重制成零基础人话版。下面每篇都能直接读，想动手就进互动课。
- 1Correlation ≠ CausationTwo things showing up together doesn't mean one caused the other
- 2Common Logical FallaciesSpotting the moves that "sound reasonable"
- 3How to Judge Whether Information Is TrustworthySelf-defense for information in the age of AI
- 4Premises and ConclusionsIn a passage, which sentence is the claim and which ones are the reasons backing it up
- 5Deduction vs. InductionReasoning that must be true, versus reasoning that's only "very likely"
- 6What Makes a "Good Argument"The premises must be true and the reasoning must hold up—you need both
- 7More FallaciesAppeal to emotion, ad hominem, false dilemma, and circular reasoning
- 8How Biases Quietly Skew Your JudgmentWhat confirmation bias and anchoring look like in everyday life
- 9Sunk Cost & Survivorship BiasMoney already spent shouldn't hijack the future, and looking only at success stories will lead you astray
- 10Reading Data Without Being FooledThe percentage trap, the average-number con, and scary-looking charts
- 11How to Evaluate a "Study" or "Expert Opinion"Sample size, correlation vs. causation, conflicts of interest, and reproducibility
- 12How to Argue ReasonablyAddress the issue not the person, read the other side charitably, and admit you might be wrong
测一测 🧠
学完顺手检验一下，看你能认出几个。
GMAT 批判性推理题：12 道练习题附答案八种 GMAT CR 题型，十二段商业味论证。逻辑谬误测验：你能一眼看穿话术吗？12 个对话，看你能认出几个逻辑陷阱认知偏误测验：你最容易中哪些思维陷阱？12 个日常瞬间，你中了哪些思维陷阱演绎推理 vs 归纳推理：到底差在哪？自上而下还是自下而上？12 个真实论证，你能全判对吗？LSAT 逻辑推理缺陷题（Flaw）免费练习测验12 道 LSAT 风格缺陷题 · 每题 5 选项 · 附解析假设题练习：LSAT / GMAT 逻辑假设 12 题（含取反检验法）找出论证从没提过、却撑着它的那面承重墙。加强与削弱题练习：LSAT / GMAT 逻辑 12 题先找缝，再决定：是补它，还是撬它。论证方法题练习：LSAT / GMAT 逻辑 12 题描述这一手，别给它打分。免费逻辑推理测试：12 道求职测评练习题（含解析）只判断材料说了什么——这一条就是这类测评的大半。GRE Analyze an Argument 已于 2023 年取消——那该练什么？作文没了，这项能力还在考。相关 vs 因果测验相关只是耳语,因果需要证据。必要条件 vs 充分条件测验把「只有…才」和「只要…就」一次分清。基率谬误测验阳性≠患病，告警≠欺诈——测测你会不会被分母骗。